Popular Music Hits Explained
Popular Music Hits Explained
MUSICAL AESTHETICS V.S. MUSIC COMMUNICATION
Author Deanna D. Sellnow discusses the difference between "musical aesthetics" and "music as communication". Based on my understanding of what I have read I interpreted "musical aesthetics" as appreciating the art of music objectively by genres, patterns, instruments, and tempo. Examples of this can be seen in something like the Opera of Classical Music. "musical aesthetics can also be someone that listens to music just because they enjoy it but do not analyze it in any way. While "music as communication" is the basis of how most people listen to music, objectively connecting a type of emotional meaning to the art. These are my interpretations of the two definitions. However, I believe these two definitions can be a hybrid or dynamic of some sort. For example, someone can critically analyze a song and it could be great but they have a deep connection to the art and dislike it or vice versa. A great example of this can be seen in this song;
To this day I still love Alicia Keys's hit song "All I Want for Christmas" for several reasons it is well-produced, and catchy and the vocals are amazing. However, I know and have met several people who work in retail who despise this song. The reason why they hate this song so much is their deep connection to having to work long busy hours during the holiday and being underpaid while this played on repeat at the store for hours on end. That strong emotional connection that we make to music and art is what Sellnow calls the "Illusion of Life Theory." In other words, Pop Culture music often contains emotional content that represents our feelings." These examples can be good or bad and are overall, dependent on the person.
POP CULTURE STANDARDS
In "Cultural Theory and Popular Culture a Reader" the author discusses Theodor W. Adono's concept that all popular music is unoriginal. For example, on page 64 it is stated "The whole structure of popular music is standardized, even where the attempt is made to circumvent standardization. Standardization extends from the most general features to the most specific ones." The author continues to list specific examples including the similarity of bar lyrics, and tempo patterns originating from nursery rhymes to Pop Culture songs.
Although, I believe this concept or theory is accurate I do not believe it is fair to state all artists our unoriginal, for it is normal for creators to be influenced by one another as music evolves. One common example that people always talk about when a "sample" or artist influence goes too far is rapper Vanilla Ice's song "Ice Ice Baby" and Queen's "Under Pressure" If you have not heard these two songs you are in for a treat;
Sellnow, D. D. (2010). The rhetorical power of popular culture. London: Sage.
I agree with you on various points, especially regarding the endless similarities between songs. However, I would like to add another point to the idea of paying tribute to the artists who came before them. I believe that music should be an authentic art form, with elements that contribute to a cohesive whole, as explained in Sellnow's theory of musical ascription.
ReplyDeleteThis authenticity has been lost over time, with the introduction of music labels, studios, directors, and producers. While an artist may create a unique piece for their audience, once it falls into the hands of a producer—who may have worked with other artists shortly before—patterns from those other artists may be unintentionally or intentionally introduced, resulting in similar songs saturating the airwaves and televisions.
In response to your question, I used to focus on the aesthetic aspects of music when I was younger. However, as I've grown older, I find myself paying more attention to its ability to communicate.